This sketch symbolises Oppression and
slavery , which is one of the most important theme in this novel. In this novel
, Annette who is Antoinette’s young and beautiful mother and also the second
wife to Alexander Cosway and later to Mr.Mason. Throughout the novel we get to
understand the fact on how helplessly Annette has been imprisoned at Coulibri
Estate after the death of her husband. Her daughter Antoinette suffers the same
fate and is doomed to a form of enslavement in her love for and dependency upon
her husband. The dependence of women from when they are a child represents a
figurative slavery which is a form of physical captivity.
Wider Saragasso Sea
Monday, September 9, 2013
Hysteria - Jinsha Mary Koshy (part 1)1114226
This
picture depicts Antoinette, who is suffering from the disease Hysteria. People
who are hysterical often lose self-control due to an overwhelming fear that
may be caused by events in one’s past that involved some sort of severe
conflict. The fear can be centred on a body part or mostly on an imagined
problem with that body part. Through this novel, Madness is intricately linked
with images of heat, fire, and female sexuality. Antoinette feels rejected and
displaced with no one to love her .She becomes paranoid and solitary and prone
to vivid dreams and violent out bursts. This madness consigns her to live
invisible and shameful lives.
Antoinette sketch-Bagisha Mandal(part 1) 1114218
This sketch calls ones attention the
posture of confinement and suppression of the self and sexuality, in restricted
lines drawn around the figure. Antoinette’s personality and sense of self was
constrained exactly so. It almost goes to show how Antoinette’s desire to grow;
her emotions etc was to be contained. As if the darker side of the female self
was to be suppressed until the body was completely bent inward.
As we do know this character has shown emotion
very self-consciously. Her anger, her desire for her husband (Mr. Rochester),
her need to be loved and taken care of was never fully released until she
became Bertha Mason- the mad woman in the attic. It was as bertha did she
finally release her pent up longing and desire in the darkest way possible-
through burning the mansion down.
This sketch follows ideas of confinement
in a set of lines, lines that are around her body and another higher over her
entire being. One set of line forms a sort of a triangle another, a square. The
triangle can be interpreted as her immediate limitations she feels from people
closely associated to her, that is, her family, husband and servants. While the
larger lines forming the square maybe interpreted the society, that is, the
Victorian society and the Negro society of her birth place. Both the societies
looked at Antoinette as an odd creature not belonging to a specific one origin.
The fact of her looks being English and behaviour and attitude the opposite,
lead these society of people to judge and condemn her harshly and critically.
Thus Antoinette repressed her true behaviour and emotions even more so.
Marriage and divorce in victorian britian-Preethi G raj 1114293
In the Victorian era, marriage was not as romanticized or fairytale-like as depicted in many novels of the time. On the contrary, love actually played a very minor role in the majority of matrimonies that took place. An engagement was entered into as one would approach a business deal, and there were some generally accepted rules and guidelines to follow.
There were rules that needed to be followed like
- It was illegal to marry
your deceased wife’s sister. You could marry first cousins, but attitudes
changed towards the end of the 19th century, and this became frowned upon.
- Victorians were encouraged
to marry within the same class (remember the views on social mobility!). They
could marry up, but to marry down meant marrying beneath yourself.
- A woman entering into
the institute of marriage had to be equipped with a dowry. The husband-to-be
had to prove that he could support his new bride in the lifestyle she was
accustomed to.
Views on Divorce
- Divorce was difficult
to obtain; the only acceptable reason for divorce was adultery, and even then
it was only a valid reason for a man. Women could use adultery as an excuse
to divorce her husband, but she also had to supplement it with a reason proving
her husband “engaged in incest, bigamy, or excessive cruelty” (Marriage
and Divorce).
- Though this was a double
standard, the reason for it was this: men were viewed to “take care”
of their wives, and thought that their fidelity should not matter; women on
the other hand, if caught cheating, were seen as disrespecting the “care”
of their husbands.
- Laws were modified in the mid-19th century to make divorce more accessible to both men and women, but it was still scarce. Women saw marriage as a way to gain independence from their families and to start a new life, even though their husbands were granted all of the power.
- Divorce was extremely expensive; it entailed the loss of wealth and property. Since it accumulated from generation to generation and helped to strengthen the family line, divorce was neither economically or socially practical. It would guarantee the family losing some of its strength and influence by giving up property and wealth.
'COLONISING' WITHIN THE MARRIAGE : Sanju Joseph 114239
'COLONISING'
WITHIN THE MARRIAGE :
Jean Rhys complex text, Wide Sargasso Sea, came about as an attempt to re-invent an identity for Rochester's mad wife, Bertha Mason, in Jane Eyre, as Rhys felt that Bronte had totally misrepresented Creole women and the West Indies: 'why should she think Creole women are lunatics and all that? It is clear that Rhys wanted to reclaim a voice and subjectivity for Bertha, the silenced Creole, and to subvert the assumptions made by the Victorian text. She does so with startling results. In her quest to re-instate Bertha's identity, Rhys raises issues such as the problems of colonisation, gender relations and racial issues. She explores the themes of displacement, Creolisation and miscegenation. However, the aim of this essay is to look at the marriage contract within the text, its effects on the participants' sense of selfhood and its comparisons with the colonial encounter.The marriage contract, for Rhys, is ultimately cast as a colonial encounter in the novel. However, the problem of displacement and a shaky sense of one's own identity are already well established in the first part of the text, long before the marriage takes place. It seems that Rhys wants to bring the problems of the Creole existence to the fore at the very beginning of the novel, and lay emphasis on Antoinette's feelings of alienation: the white Creoles are neither part of the black slave community or accepted as European either (a lack of belonging that Rhys knew all too well) Though this is a childish taunt in the novel, the truth of it is that nobody does want Antoinette; not even her own mother: 'Antoinette is also alienated from the meagre remains of her family itself, and, most specifically, from her mother's love.The second part of the novel marks the beginning of the marriage between Antoinette and the English gentleman (normally identified as Rochester from Jane Eyre; he will be referred to as such for the remainder of the essay). The Marriage contract itself, interestingly, is negotiated and put into action by a series of men: Rochester's father and brother, Antoinette's stepfather and, subsequently, her step-brother, Richard Mason. When Antoinette herself puts up a half-hearted resistance to the marriage, both Rochester and Richard Mason step in to push the contract along. Already, Rhys, within the marriage, establishes action as a male characteristic and inertia as female. In part II, Rochester takes over from Antoinette as narrator. Also, the feelings of displacement and problems of identity are shifted onto him. Rochester, at Granbois, experiences a complete lack of power normally exercised by the English gentleman, at once having to deal with the strange otherness of the West Indies and cope with the rejection by his father and brother. According to O'Connor 'he experiences what it is like to be a woman'. The marriage has placed him in the position of the female: without power, without knowledge and without a sense of an English or metropolitan identity. He is the 'dispossessed coloniser, unable to reconcile his English identity with the strangeness of the periphery, frustrated with his inability to know and control the place. Antoinette, on the other hand, appears to have gained a sense of belonging at Granbois from the onset of the marriage. She says of the place: 'this is my place’ and 'here, I can do as I like'. Rhys, here, links knowledge and power: as Antoinette has knowledge of the island, she is in the position of power, a situation that embitters Rochester as time goes on: 'Her [Antoinette's] pleading expression annoys me. I have not bought her, she has bought me. Of course, as this is all told from Rochester's view-point, we can never actually know if this is how Antoinette really feels. To Rochester, she seems to be simply another aspect of the West Indies' otherness that he cannot connect with.Rhys takes care to portray Rochester's crisis of identity in the West Indies as she does the Creoles'. The development of the marriage into a colonial allegory takes place as Rochester begins to try and deal with the problems of displacement. Rhys writes him directly into the roles of coloniser at the point where he changes Antoinette's name to Bertha, attempting to change the Creole other he imagines in her into something 'knowable'. He then demonstrates his sexual power over her by denying her a physical relationship with him, yet sleeping with Amelie within her hearing, driving her further away from her new-found sense of identity and back into the sense of placelessness she felt in the novel's first part. Finally, Rochester, assuming 'the traditional stance of male imperialist authority...silencing the woman's voice ‘physically displaces her, splitting her from the West. At this point in the novel, Rochester's role as coloniser and Antoinette's as colonised within the marriage are fully realised. Rochester, in the position of power, has successfully taken possession of Antoinette's wealth, property and identity. Antoinette, stripped of all three, has made the transition from Rhys' text to the imperial construction of the mad woman in the attic of Jane Eyre.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)